BANKING & MORTGAGE LENDING LITIGATION | SETTLEMENTS:

• Assignee Trust Loan Liability | BuyBack Litigation |
  BuyBack Negotiation | BuyBack Settlement
• "Secondary Market Liability for Originating Predatory Loans and Assignee Liability vs.
  Public Policy Concerns"

Welcome to our Web site! We are California Attorneys & Counselors At Law, serving California Clients only; however we do associate on select matters with national lawyers or lawyers from other States, Countries, or jurisdictions. The firm handles matters of Litigation, Transaction, and Negotiation, in Civil, Criminal, International and Policy matters. The firm also handles Business, Lending, Corporate and SOX matters. The firm’s national associates have recovered billions in redress. The firm has no allegiance to any one industry.

    Help4TheServicers™  | Help4TheLenders™

HELPING BANKS, LENDERS & SERVICERS HELP BORROWERS!™

HotNeutral™

Attorney Specialized Fast Loan Workouts & Infused Lender Risk & Loss Mitigation
Avoid Delays, Foreclosures & REOs! Critical Solutions for all Market Participants!
HotNeutral.Com™ | NeutralHotTransfers™ | BankRiskMitigation™ | Help4ThePeople™
Information line 800-770-0797 extension 702

New Problems, New Solutions!™
Band-Aid Extensions Won’t Work! Learn Our Mutual Waiver 4B Loan Modification Solution!
Learn About TID™, SHILO™, FMII™ Safe Harbor Contract and Fair Debt Solutions!

• BuyBack and Assignee Trust Loan Litigation or Liability

Wall Street is not sitting around waiting to lose-their-shirt in this recent SubPrime Default & Foreclosure meltdown. If Wall Street implements a policy of demand and litigation against the Lenders for buy-backs of bad loans, the lenders/brokers and consumers may end up holding the loss. This may result in substantial BuyBack and Assignee Trust loan litigation or liability. This move has the potential to allow Wall Street to buy the bad and good loan portfolios for pennies on the dollar in bankruptcy court. The kicker is, they may try to do so without the liability exposure, leaving the risk and liability to the Lenders/Brokers and Consumers. Talk about follow the money. That area itself will be subject to huge litigation challenges for “public policy violations” to say the least.

Who in the funding and lending process knew that the price/risk formula was corrupt? Did investors know or understand the affect that mal-priced non-mitigated piggybacks (ARMs, etc.) would have on long term affordability? Did investors know or understand, or intend to accept or assign (bad) loans?